Comments on: She Was Just Begging for This – Part I

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:45:09 +0000

I’m not sure how I missed your comment, ryukyu.

I was referring to his time as a state senator.

By: ryukyu

ryukyu — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:42:30 +0000

“The man voted against a law that would have made it a crime to leave a born-alive ‘botched’ abortion (in other words, a baby) alone to die in a closet.”

I thought after all his campaigning against and even taking the floor against the bill, he voted “present” once again?

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:55:06 +0000

Yep you got it. CINOS!

By: Mighty Skip

Mighty Skip — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:51:22 +0000

It is my understanding a Cafeteria Catholic is someone who takes things they like from the church doctrine and teachings but leaves behind things they don’t like. Like picking food from a cafeteria line.

By: Scott M.

Scott M. — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:05:44 +0000

Mean like Nancy Pelosi,Stephanie?Joe Biden?

By: Republibot 3.0

Republibot 3.0 — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:53:45 +0000

heyyyyy! I posted a big reply here yesterday, and it’s not on the site! What happened?

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:42:16 +0000

May I answer this Father?

Kit, a Cafeteria Catholic is one who picks and chooses which Church dogma they agree with. Like abortion, etc. They also very rarely are seen at Church. They go on Holidays and thats about it. But in reality they are Catholic in name only. CINO.

By: Kit

Kit — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:01:14 +0000

Fr, what is a Cafeteria Catholic?

By: Fr. Ron

Fr. Ron — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:10:30 +0000

“So when the pope agrees with Obama, he gives the president’s message moral credence, but when he disagrees, then the pope is to be ignored?”

–Of course, this is the mindset of Cafeteria Catholic, so it shouldn’t surprise us that she would think this is how all other “right-minded” should think!

“To the pope, a respect for nature is a respect for all of nature, period. All of it, including and especially human nature. An environmentalism that has no respect for man and no respect for human life is completely at odds with Catholic teaching. It is our duty to protect the environment in our role as stewards of the earth, but that is a far cry from what “environmentalism” has come to mean. “Conservation” would be the more appropriate word, and again this is nothing new, and nothing that conservatives would oppose.”

– Very well put! In my experience, many “environmentalists” have a deep hatred for the human race and probably for themselves.

By: Republibot 3.0

Republibot 3.0 — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:00:58 +0000

>>So when the pope agrees with Obama, he gives the president’s message moral credence, but when he disagrees, then the pope is to be ignored?<<

Well, yeah. That's the way politics always works. There's this great scene in Zamyatin's novel "We" in which the dissenters vote "No" in the assembly, and this causes all higgaldy piggaldy. The next day the news reports it was yet another unanimous victory for the party in power. When questioned about the 'nay' votes, we're told they were simply ignored. "Why would anyone count a 'no' vote anyway?"

When the Democrats win they claim it's the will of the people, the people are wise and brilliant, and their decisions can not be questioned. When they loose, you get Nancy Pellosi talking about how people who believe in God are stupid, and she can't believe people would vote against them, and the people don't know what's good for them, and the voters are fools.

I don't see a difference here.