<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You are No Match for Bruce Lee&#8217;s Balls of Fury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076</link>
	<description>These are our principles.  If you don&#039;t like them, we have others...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37195</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37195</guid>
		<description>Funny you should mention Rhode Island,Floyd...did you read where this ignoramus in the legislature wants to drop &quot;Providence Plantations&quot; from RI&#039;s official name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention Rhode Island,Floyd&#8230;did you read where this ignoramus in the legislature wants to drop &#8220;Providence Plantations&#8221; from RI&#8217;s official name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fritz8945</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37183</link>
		<dc:creator>fritz8945</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37183</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the seperation of church and state. I&#039;ll just about stake my life on this though, that the intent was not seen as how it turned out when the idea was bastardized in 1947, and compounded in recent years past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the seperation of church and state. I&#8217;ll just about stake my life on this though, that the intent was not seen as how it turned out when the idea was bastardized in 1947, and compounded in recent years past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37180</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37180</guid>
		<description>Scott... I realize that, but they were passed by the states to limit the federal government&#039;s ability encroach on individual and state&#039;s rights.  Soon after the 11th Amendment recognizing the Sovereign Immunity of States from being haled in to federal court was ratified -- specifically overruling the first landmark case by SCOTUS -- Chisholm v. Georgia in 1793 in which SCOTUS ordered Georgia to pay a debt dating from the War for Independence.  I believe that coming so soon on the heels of the Bill of Rights it shows a real trend to rein in (or keep it reined) the federal government a bit since the original Constitution (pre Bill) is very sparse.

Each State is made up of Americans -- as such they value religious liberty, free speech, etc. -- ALL the things protected by the U.S. COnstitution -- that&#039;s why there&#039;s so much redundancy built in.  The basic premise is &quot;Free Speech&quot;.  If Georgia wants a more British version of free speech (which isn&#039;t as free as ours) then so be it -- I wager the citizens of Georgia would then change the law via their duly elected State Legislature or they&#039;d see an exodus of professionals, etc. who don&#039;t like prior restraints on speech, etc.    Why should SCOTUS be able to dictate to ALL 50 States what they can and can&#039;t do?  If Utah wants to outlaw nudie bars, for another example, as obscene then Nevada will make more money.  The fact is -- Washington -- the federal government doesn&#039;t trust Americans to govern themselves and so we have to be told to separate Church and State as if any American truly wants to meld the two anymore.  I can speak as a Baptist -- we are THE group that just about invented separation of Church and State (Roger WIlliams and Rhode Island).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8230; I realize that, but they were passed by the states to limit the federal government&#8217;s ability encroach on individual and state&#8217;s rights.  Soon after the 11th Amendment recognizing the Sovereign Immunity of States from being haled in to federal court was ratified &#8212; specifically overruling the first landmark case by SCOTUS &#8212; Chisholm v. Georgia in 1793 in which SCOTUS ordered Georgia to pay a debt dating from the War for Independence.  I believe that coming so soon on the heels of the Bill of Rights it shows a real trend to rein in (or keep it reined) the federal government a bit since the original Constitution (pre Bill) is very sparse.</p>
<p>Each State is made up of Americans &#8212; as such they value religious liberty, free speech, etc. &#8212; ALL the things protected by the U.S. COnstitution &#8212; that&#8217;s why there&#8217;s so much redundancy built in.  The basic premise is &#8220;Free Speech&#8221;.  If Georgia wants a more British version of free speech (which isn&#8217;t as free as ours) then so be it &#8212; I wager the citizens of Georgia would then change the law via their duly elected State Legislature or they&#8217;d see an exodus of professionals, etc. who don&#8217;t like prior restraints on speech, etc.    Why should SCOTUS be able to dictate to ALL 50 States what they can and can&#8217;t do?  If Utah wants to outlaw nudie bars, for another example, as obscene then Nevada will make more money.  The fact is &#8212; Washington &#8212; the federal government doesn&#8217;t trust Americans to govern themselves and so we have to be told to separate Church and State as if any American truly wants to meld the two anymore.  I can speak as a Baptist &#8212; we are THE group that just about invented separation of Church and State (Roger WIlliams and Rhode Island).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fritz8945</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37175</link>
		<dc:creator>fritz8945</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37175</guid>
		<description>I believe that&#039;s why they&#039;re called &quot;Amendments.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re called &#8220;Amendments.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37174</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37174</guid>
		<description>But,Floyd,the Bill of Rights are as much a part of the Constitution as the 3 Articles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But,Floyd,the Bill of Rights are as much a part of the Constitution as the 3 Articles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37156</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37156</guid>
		<description>Interesting constitutional discussion. I enjoyed reading it. :)  

I will limit myself to comment that Bruce Lee was, indeed, an out-of-this-world martial artist.  Lots of things have changed in martial arts, but his principles stand (and seem to apply even to ping-pong :) ).  It could be argued that his ground-fighting was limited or non-existent, but even if that were true, he was too fast to ever be taken to the ground--like trying to make a cat land on his back. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting constitutional discussion. I enjoyed reading it. <img src='http://www.threedonia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I will limit myself to comment that Bruce Lee was, indeed, an out-of-this-world martial artist.  Lots of things have changed in martial arts, but his principles stand (and seem to apply even to ping-pong <img src='http://www.threedonia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).  It could be argued that his ground-fighting was limited or non-existent, but even if that were true, he was too fast to ever be taken to the ground&#8211;like trying to make a cat land on his back. <img src='http://www.threedonia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37139</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37139</guid>
		<description>Okay, I have two comments awaiting moderation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I have two comments awaiting moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37138</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37138</guid>
		<description>Floyd,

Since we are on the topic of Constitutions

If your state had a constitution that, ratified in 1901, had 287 Sections and 799 Amendments, an amendment regarding how much money may be used for bingo in one country, and another amendment regarding the exchumation of bodies in another county, would you redo it?

(I am talking about the Alabama State Constitution)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd,</p>
<p>Since we are on the topic of Constitutions</p>
<p>If your state had a constitution that, ratified in 1901, had 287 Sections and 799 Amendments, an amendment regarding how much money may be used for bingo in one country, and another amendment regarding the exchumation of bodies in another county, would you redo it?</p>
<p>(I am talking about the Alabama State Constitution)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37137</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37137</guid>
		<description>Be very afraid, Scott, I hear he swallows instead of spits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be very afraid, Scott, I hear he swallows instead of spits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/10076/comment-page-1#comment-37136</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=10076#comment-37136</guid>
		<description>Floyd,

If your state had a constitution that, ratified in  1901, had 287 Sections and 799 Amendments, would you want to reform it?

Most of the tax laws, since local governments cannot independently pass tax ordinances, are in the constitution.

Here are two Amendments in the Alabama Constitution:

&quot;Prizes given by any nonprofit organization for the playing of bingo games in Jefferson County shall not exceed the amounts set by local law&quot; (Amendment 600)

&quot;The Madison county commission is hereby authorized with or without charge to provide for the excavating of human graves.&quot; (Amendment 520)

Here it is:
http://www.legislature.state.al.us/Codeofalabama/constitution/1901/constitution1901_toc.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd,</p>
<p>If your state had a constitution that, ratified in  1901, had 287 Sections and 799 Amendments, would you want to reform it?</p>
<p>Most of the tax laws, since local governments cannot independently pass tax ordinances, are in the constitution.</p>
<p>Here are two Amendments in the Alabama Constitution:</p>
<p>&#8220;Prizes given by any nonprofit organization for the playing of bingo games in Jefferson County shall not exceed the amounts set by local law&#8221; (Amendment 600)</p>
<p>&#8220;The Madison county commission is hereby authorized with or without charge to provide for the excavating of human graves.&#8221; (Amendment 520)</p>
<p>Here it is:<br />
<a href="http://www.legislature.state.al.us/Codeofalabama/constitution/1901/constitution1901_toc.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.legislature.state.al.us/Codeofalabama/constitution/1901/constitution1901_toc.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
