Not that it ultimately matters because I’m sure both sergeants and the the folks at Ft. Hood are just glad Hasan got shot, but it is very interesting given the Politically Correct causes of this incident that political correctness might be rearing its head in the post mortem.
From The New York Times:
But the story of how the petite police officer and the accused gunman went down in an exchange of gunfire does not agree with the account of an eyewitness who had gone to the base’s processing center, where the shooting occurred, to conduct business before being deployed.
The witness, who asked not to be identified, said Major Hasan wheeled on Sergeant Munley as she rounded the corner of a building and shot her, putting her on the ground. Then Major Hasan turned his back on her and started putting another magazine into his semiautomatic pistol.
It was at that moment that Senior Sgt. Mark Todd, a veteran police officer, rounded another corner of the building, found Major Hasan fumbling with his weapon and shot him.
How the authorities came to issue the original version of the story, which made Sergeant Munley a national hero for several days and obscured Sergeant Todd’s role, remains unclear. (Military officials also said for several hours after the shooting that Major Hasan had been killed, although he had survived.)
Six days after the deadly shooting rampage at a center where soldiers were preparing for deployment, the military has yet to put out a full account of what happened.
At a news conference outside the post on Wednesday, Lt. Col. John Rossi refused to take questions about who shot Major Hasan or why the initial reports said it had been Sergeant Munley rather than Sergeant Todd.
“These questions are specific to the investigation and I am not going to address that,” Colonel Rossi said.
Public affairs officials also declined to make Chuck Medley, the director of emergency services at the post, available for questions. It was Mr. Medley, who oversees the post’s civilian police and fire departments, who gave the first account of how Sergeant Munley stopped the gunman.
On Tuesday night, Lt. Col. Lee Packnett, of the Army’s Office of the Chief of Public Affairs at the Pentagon, declined to say whether it was Sergeant Todd who had shot Major Hasan. “It could have been, but the final outcome will be determined by the results of the ballistics tests.”
In an interview on Wednesday, Sergeant Todd’s wife, Lisa, said he had asked the Army to protect his identity in the immediate aftermath of the shootings. Her husband did not consider himself to be the real hero of the day, she said. “They were in this together,” she said.
One of the real evils of PC is that Sgt. Munley — who acted heroically whether or not she shot Hasan — is now put in an awkward position as if she somehow is less of an officer. The case can be made that whichever officer turned the corner first — by engaging Hasan — enabled the second officer to drop him. By jumping to conclusions (where they not listening to their commander in chief?) the authorities here have made stuff up that calls into question the investigation. If they lie immediately as to who dropped the suspect how can that person testify in court? I would rip them up on cross-examination. I’m not saying it would work, but why risk a case by fibbing about heroics?
The author also raises the specter of Jessica Lynch and the initial pumped stories of here case which turned out to be just so much bunkum — again not her fault and it put her in an awkward position.
Munley received the call — drove to the scene — RAN to the gunfire and engaged an active shooter. By any definition that is heroism at its finest in the highest traditions of valor. By gilding the lily because she’s a woman the authorities imply that she (and women in general?) needs their help burnishing her credentials? It’s ludicrous in this instance and in general. There’s glory enough for both and it looks like Sgt. Todd has Munley’s back both then and now. They both are heroes. Thank God they were there to engage and dump Hasan. Their only fault can be summed up in two words: HEAD SHOT. But that’s just being nit-picky.
Count this as reason #698,409 to hate political correctness. Now instead of celebrating these two heroes one is left trying to explain his role and one is left minimizing her role. Neither should have to do that.
Print
Digg
StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
Facebook
Yahoo! Buzz
Twitter
Google Bookmarks
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
MSN Reporter
MySpace
Orkut
Ping.fm
Reddit
RSS
Slashdot
Technorati
Tumblr
Webnews.de
This whole instance, be it the shoooting, Hasan, the lead up, the Army’s response, the response of the White House and the response by the media, has been illuminating. How rare that something, in this case political correctness, is shown to be such a colossally dangerous mechanism. It’s so ingrained in the leadership and elite quarters, even though well over a plurality of those polled want this treated as a terrorist incident the Army, which was supposed to be the least politically correct segment of our society left, is left grasping at straws and laying out platitudes.
Guns don’t kill – political correctness does!
Sgt. Munley is now the Donovan McNabb of the Hasan incident: any issues of her heroism (as Floyd points out, she ran to the sound of the gunfire) are secondary to the Old Line media’s desire to have a female hero(ine.) As McNabb’s actual prowess was, for the OLM, secondary to his skin color, so Munley’s actions are secondary to her sex. As John Ford “wrote” in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance: “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”
Anyone who has served in the last several years isn’t surprised by anything that has been written or said after the incident.
We are all required to attend cultural awareness and sensitivity training as well as sexual harassment and other equal opportunity classes on a yearly basis. Each unit has an Equal Opportunity officer and NCO, who is available to listen to any complaint actual or otherwise and open an investigation into same.
Yes, the military in non-PC in many ways, we are more results oriented as a group. But there is that stuff that everyone is noticing that bubbles to the top when you give it a closer look.
CDR Salamander has a blog, has regular diversity Thursday articles which often highlight the PC nature of our armed forces. In his particular case the USN. http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/
Actually, it’s good that there wasn’t a head shot, and the perp survived. He becomes very incovenient and it will be instructive to see how our betters (both in the military and in the administration) handle that. Too often those people get to dump their mistakes down the Memory Hole, but for some reason, I think pushing Major Hasan down it is going to, in the end, make them wish they’d had more respect for Joe the Plumber.
Jeez Outlaw. I had no idea that was all going on and again you just wouldn’t think the military would be subjected to this sort of nonsense. It is just absolutely astounding.
Am I the only one here who read Heller’s “Catch 22?” Why would anyone not expect the military to have a bloated, nonsensical bureaucracy? A hell of a lot of great guys and gals doing great things all day, everyday, but it’s still a huge, government run program. I imagine it gets more and more efficient, and less and less silly as you get closer and closer to the front lines, but the pencil pushers in Washington and at Fort Hood? How many idioms do we have in our language that come from military inefficiency? “SNAFU,” “hurry up and wait…” and a thousand more.
I’m sorry; I’m just recovering from the concussion I gave myself when I smacked myself on the forehead…
She got shot responding to the attacker and either she or the other guy shot the coward. It’s all good and what the hell difference does it make?
Any excuse to redirect Hasan being a, you know…Muslim. Even the “where did he get the handgun” card has been played. And the hangun referred to being a “Cop killer” gun. Whatever the hell that is.