(Sports Illustrated and Boston Phoenix scribe Charles Pierce recently reviewed Bill Simmons’ “The Book of Basketball” for Deadspin. My thoughts on Pierce’s thoughts was going to be this blog post, until it turned into something else. That original post may come somewhere down the line, but for now, here’s that “something else.”)
I hate Deadspin, the supposed “irreverent” sports blog, and its ilk. I hate Bill Simmons, who I used to like until I learned to write, and I hate what my profession is turning into on the web. With that in mind, I turned a kind eye to Charles Pierce’s review of Bill Simmons’ The Book of Basketball, recently flooded to the press with much whoring from ESPN and its various syndicates.
How shocked was I to see Pierce, of all people, the Sports Illustrated god, writing for a blog whose lineup includes someone named “Balls Deep.” Pierce is a fine sports writer. He can turn a phrase well, he’s worked for the giants in the industry and he’s as vindictive as they come.
Pierce – whose main criticisms of Simmons center around his tendency to credit himself for being first to inject his prose with nauseous pop culture references, as well as to rely on his many self-created cliches – strikes with a cliche of his own in the beginning of his review – the backhanded compliment.
After all, The Book Of Basketball is at the top of The New York Times bestseller list, and it already has done the world the great service of dumping from that spot Mitch Albom’s latest exercise in Flintstones Chewable Eschatology. And it may just be big and heavy and lumpy enough to keep Sarah Palin’s upcoming tome, My Vengeful Screaming Vagina, out of the top spot. This volume already has done much good for American letters in general.
I can’t imagine Pierce’s reaction to calling Gloria Steinem a “vengeful screaming vagina,” or any of the myriad of liberal women whose main pursuit in life is to be angry about something, usually men. But as far as vengeful vaginas go, Pierce would recognize one, he has to see one in the mirror every morning when he gets up.
In regard to Sarah Palin, the whole media establishment has becoming a baying chorus of vengeful vaginas. This is an attractive woman, living the lifestyle they dread, an ideology they detest, and doing so to more and more success. No wonder Pierce and The Atlantic’s resident homosexual gynecology expert can’t help but be fascinated at her innermost workings.
And they know fascination is as far as it would ever get. There’s no question Palin’s taste in men – it’s not hard to figure which side of the alpha/beta male divide her snowmobile-racing, professional-fishing beau rests. There’s something about that which eats the vengeful vagina party up, that after 40 years of emasculating men from the culture and the leadership (and to much success) here comes this vamp from Alaska who finds success while breathing the scent of testosterone in her midst.
Vengeful is one word, another word is hateful, and that describes Pierce in the lead up to his recent book Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free, where Pierce laments how stupid our country is becoming. Case in point, the Creation Museum in Kentucky, which Pierce apparently believes shouldn’t be allowed to exist. Damn those dangerous Creationists and their apostasy. Though I’ve never picked up the book, I doubt if there is much criticism, of say, those living in Africa or the Middle East where Creation is downright contemporary compared to some of the beliefs being bandied about. Notice he keeps his targets centered to America, venturing outward may be politically incorrect and we know how vengeful vaginas get when they are politically incorrect.
But, Creationists don’t strap C4 to themselves or charge the mess hall locked and loaded, so brave and independent thinkers like Pierce are free to attack. It works for Roland Emmerich, who is willing to blow up anything he can animate in a movie, as long as it’s Christian or Western.
Pierce’s article is titled “You Are Not The Cosmos,” a take on the late Molly Ivins and a column she wrote on Camille Paglia. Ivins could match Pierce in cruelty per syllable, and she was more than willing to sell out her own feminist belief system if it meant goodies for her guys, especially Clinton. Paglia, on the other hand, is an unapologetic lefty but she’s intellectually honest, something Pierce or Ivins would never consider because they deal in cruelty.
Pierce and his like are cruel because they think it’s funny. The crueler, the more outlandish, the better, as long as its the right target. This meme has been carried throughout the entire culture. Weeks after Palin appeared on the national scene, porno directors were already casting look-a-likes for various capers, all the while the media establishment poked and prodded her with glee. The press is willing to let Levi Johnston libel her continuously with no basis in fact, but two kids with videotape from an ACORN office are scandalous. That’s all well and good, but to dare utter “socialist” or some other screed toward our black president, and your unleashing a sea of racism. The vaginas don’t like that.
Why the double standard? Why is cruelty OK? Are the screaming vaginas just a bunch of effete, wimpy, ball-less, gutless wallowing in their own mess? Pretty much.
Hate to break it to Capt. Vagina, but Sarah’s book has nothing to worry about from Bill Simmons’. Sorry, “Sports Guy,” but you’ll be just another stain on the highway with a goofy haircut (but at least you have hair).
Off topic but I just got back from hanging out with Eric in Toledo…good times
It’s true, blackhawk rocks … and, ladies, he’s even sexier in glasses.
Thanks again for comin’ to the blues show, man!
Even Paglia wrote that this sexist hate towards Palin is going to come back and haunt the left.
Pagila is on the oppostie side of most lefties in that she actually really admires Palin and blast the left’s treatment of her. Then again Pagila also openly refers to abortion as murder. I have a lot of respect for her honesty.
I don’t think there is a reasonable or logical explanation. It’s pretty much emotional responses.
Good Lord but that was some brilliant prose JohnFN. Bravo. Huzzah even!
In my alter-ego form of Loki, I wandered onto Pierce’s personal website and took advantage of his ‘contact me’ form to send the following:
“A fellow I blogged with nailed it:
“…as far as vengeful vaginas go, Pierce would recognize one, he has to see one in the mirror every morning when he gets up.”
http://www.threedonia.com/archives/16018 (for the rest of a brilliantly written riposte).
But then the worst thing that ever happen to journalism was journalism schools.
Cheers,
Rich”
Great thoughts should always be shared – particularly with the douche that inspired them.
The country produced some fine journalism between the 20s and 70s without journalism schools. Once it became a “profession” and a set of educational standards, it all disappeared, mainly because new journalism students weren’t so much as interested in journalism as in acting out their moral fantasies alla Woodward and Bernstein. Not that Woodward and Bernstein weren’t journalist or didn’t do good work, I think they did, but to many youth they became rockstars and something to be imitated like Janis Joplin. The degree was a ticket to celebrity or a “way to change the world,” not to report on it.
I’m self taught, which many of my critics over the years would find easy to believe. But I honed my craft – learned it and became a somewhat respectable journalist. As a writer and a reporter, I can hang with guys at metros who have been doing this for decades. I’ve had more than my share of young apples from the J-schools wander in, and once you try helping them with style, communicating or ways of learning information, they blank out on you – that’s actual work. They never showed that part in “All The President’s Men.” Many of these kids want to be Bill Simmons, because Simmons sits on his couch and has written the same column for the last decade. To be anything else takes effort, and balls. Try ripping a coach to the eyes of thousands of readers, then wandering into his locker room after a loss the same day. I’m not comparing this to actual blood, sweat and tears work, but lets just say, if your goal is to be a couch columnist, like most of today’s younger journalists, then you won’t find the real stuff much to your liking.
Pierce really couldn’t stand the fact that Curt Schilling had a blog. Imagine! An athlete talking directly to fans without the great Charles Pierce being involved!
(Of course it wasn’t about Schilling’s blog, it was about his politics.)
Calling women “vaginas” is as close as this guy will ever get to one.
Here here Wanks..WORD!
Pierce you sad man. Or little boy. Makes more sense. What is yout glitch?Sarah Pain resemble the girl who jilted you in High School? Whats with all this projected self loathing tooky?
I mean man……..
Incorrect thinking, guys and gals! You are forgetting that Sarah palin is not an authentic woman and thus may be actively and aggressively disrespected by all Left-thinking persons. Thus pussies can sneer at her vagina as they demonstrate they are far more authentic women than the governor of Alaska.
Face it, confronted with a charging moose, who would you rather guarding your back: Sarah Palin or Charles Pierce?