Comments on: Criminal Persecutions (BUMPED)

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:37:24 +0000

This doesn’t surprise me. Question: Anyone else wonder after Phillips was rescued why Obama never went to meet him? I don’t think he even made an attempt to contact him after his rescue at all.

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:35:05 +0000

The storming of the ~~Bastille~~ White House commences when?

By: Thud

Thud — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:02:24 +0000

‘made him look at pornography’…the beasts,the swine, the oh sod it…who cares?

By: Floyd

Floyd — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:20:42 +0000

John… see my comment above. This matters whether or not we ratify.

If you’re a war vet and you’re in Barcelona on vacation or on business for your consulting firm and get a speeding ticket by Spanish police and they get an Interpol ICC warrant hit — they’ll arrest you and it will not matter much at that time whether or not we have ratified the treaty. How far would Obama go to get that person free? I think we know that answer, but it would be a difficult call for any President to be fair.

By: Floyd

Floyd — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:18:56 +0000

Kit… there are ways around it perhaps. Executive-congressional agreements or executive orders a la UNCLOS III.

By: JohnFN

JohnFN — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:18:25 +0000

International court authority matters only if the country under suspicion decides to subject themselves to it. I’d love to see Obama’s poll numbers if he began approving the extradition of our own soldiers to Europe to cries of “war crimes” involving pornography and pictures of mothers. I’m not giving him any benefit of the doubt, especially since his justice department is targeting guys for giving a bloody lip to a mass-murderer. And liberals wonder why we ask which side they are on.

By: Kit

Kit — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:13:31 +0000

But doesn’t Dingy need 67 votes? Which includes 7 GOP votes?

By: Mr. Sideous

Mr. Sideous — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:46:00 +0000

“Rashid said his interrogator forced him to look at pornography alongside a photograph of his mother.”

This is similar to the “smearing the Koran with menstrual blood” lies these third world dolts say. And the Left always buys it. Who else would say this but these backwards women hating thugs? Does this sound like sophisticated interrogation techniques?

This alone should suffice that the US should stay far far away from the ICC and the vindictive fools running it.

By: Floyd

Floyd — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:40:10 +0000

He does to ratify it, but not to sign it. Though if he signs it in the next two years THIS Senate under Dingy Harry would most likely ratify it.

By: Floyd

Floyd — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:38:52 +0000

That’s not the point though…. they would never be able to go on vacation abroad, serve in the military abroad (or diplomatic corps) or work overseas, etc. Any assets they may own overseas might be affected…. And if ever a Prez and Senate decide we should sign and ratify The ROme Statute they would be at risk. In other words it would be like having an indictment hanging over your head for the rest of your days.