<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moonbatman Returns!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008</link>
	<description>These are our principles.  If you don&#039;t like them, we have others...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59524</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59524</guid>
		<description>I get the feeling that that picture&#039;s been &quot;squozen.&quot;  In the original, she looks more like Queen Latifah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the feeling that that picture&#8217;s been &#8220;squozen.&#8221;  In the original, she looks more like Queen Latifah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnFN</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59519</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnFN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59519</guid>
		<description>The biggest surprise of all - I had no clue Grace Jones worked in the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest surprise of all &#8211; I had no clue Grace Jones worked in the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Marcoe</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59410</link>
		<dc:creator>David Marcoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59410</guid>
		<description>&quot;From what I understand, a good deal of the decision making comes from the senior federal employees, those who are not political appointees.&quot;

Which was especially my point in this case.

&lt;i&gt;I’m not willing to assume every political appointee is a complete dolt.&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t believe I said that, anywhere.

&lt;i&gt;I disagree with this administration’s policies, but being a Democrat doesn’t mean you need a drool cup.&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t believe I said this, either. I believe my particular point, implied in what I said, was that this administration had stuffed its cabinet-level positions--meaning heads of Departments; Secretary of State, Attorney General, etc.--with a bunch of fools, crooks and liars. The long string of craptacular decisions being made on a practically weekly basis doesn&#039;t do much to controvert this finding.

&lt;i&gt;Many of those selected for appointments are at the top of their professions.&lt;/i&gt;

Normally, yes. This administration has been abnormal in that and other regards.

&lt;i&gt;I have a good friend within the government, an avowed conservative, who briefed an Obama-appointed Deputy Secretary recently and found him to be very professional and competent.&lt;/i&gt;

A Deputy Secretary is not a cabinet-level position, which is where my criticisms were directed.

&lt;i&gt;Folks like to take shots at how poorly government is run...&lt;/i&gt; 

This administration is suffering so many scandals and embarrassments, how could one not criticize? And if you&#039;ve noticed, it&#039;s being criticized from both ends of the political spectrum. 

&lt;i&gt;...but I don’t see many lining up to take jobs within government to improve it.&lt;/i&gt;

Massive amounts of corruption and nepotism might have something to do with that. However, there are many people who are stepping up to run for office in 2010. Even one of our own Threedonia alumni is doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From what I understand, a good deal of the decision making comes from the senior federal employees, those who are not political appointees.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which was especially my point in this case.</p>
<p><i>I’m not willing to assume every political appointee is a complete dolt.</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe I said that, anywhere.</p>
<p><i>I disagree with this administration’s policies, but being a Democrat doesn’t mean you need a drool cup.</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe I said this, either. I believe my particular point, implied in what I said, was that this administration had stuffed its cabinet-level positions&#8211;meaning heads of Departments; Secretary of State, Attorney General, etc.&#8211;with a bunch of fools, crooks and liars. The long string of craptacular decisions being made on a practically weekly basis doesn&#8217;t do much to controvert this finding.</p>
<p><i>Many of those selected for appointments are at the top of their professions.</i></p>
<p>Normally, yes. This administration has been abnormal in that and other regards.</p>
<p><i>I have a good friend within the government, an avowed conservative, who briefed an Obama-appointed Deputy Secretary recently and found him to be very professional and competent.</i></p>
<p>A Deputy Secretary is not a cabinet-level position, which is where my criticisms were directed.</p>
<p><i>Folks like to take shots at how poorly government is run&#8230;</i> </p>
<p>This administration is suffering so many scandals and embarrassments, how could one not criticize? And if you&#8217;ve noticed, it&#8217;s being criticized from both ends of the political spectrum. </p>
<p><i>&#8230;but I don’t see many lining up to take jobs within government to improve it.</i></p>
<p>Massive amounts of corruption and nepotism might have something to do with that. However, there are many people who are stepping up to run for office in 2010. Even one of our own Threedonia alumni is doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59408</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59408</guid>
		<description>Yeah Karen and my bro in law had a meeting with an Obamabot this last week and found the guy to be a compelte douchebag. Sorry but my bro in laws experience carries a lot more weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Karen and my bro in law had a meeting with an Obamabot this last week and found the guy to be a compelte douchebag. Sorry but my bro in laws experience carries a lot more weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen L</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59407</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59407</guid>
		<description>Marcoe - I&#039;m curious as to how much direct experience you have with senior executives within the federal government. From what I understand, a good deal of the decision making comes from the senior federal employees, those who are not political appointees. I&#039;m not willing to assume every political appointee is a complete dolt. I disagree with this administration&#039;s policies, but being a Democrat doesn&#039;t mean you need a drool cup. That&#039;s unfair. Many of those selected for appointments are at the top of their professions. I have a good friend within the government, an avowed conservative, who briefed an Obama-appointed Deputy Secretary recently and found him to be very professional and competent. Folks like to take shots at how poorly government is run, but I don&#039;t see many lining up to take jobs within government to improve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcoe &#8211; I&#8217;m curious as to how much direct experience you have with senior executives within the federal government. From what I understand, a good deal of the decision making comes from the senior federal employees, those who are not political appointees. I&#8217;m not willing to assume every political appointee is a complete dolt. I disagree with this administration&#8217;s policies, but being a Democrat doesn&#8217;t mean you need a drool cup. That&#8217;s unfair. Many of those selected for appointments are at the top of their professions. I have a good friend within the government, an avowed conservative, who briefed an Obama-appointed Deputy Secretary recently and found him to be very professional and competent. Folks like to take shots at how poorly government is run, but I don&#8217;t see many lining up to take jobs within government to improve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59402</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59402</guid>
		<description>Like I said there is something truly seedy going on here and I can&#039;t figure it out. I can&#039;t believe they would just allow this to fester out of pure infantilism. It makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said there is something truly seedy going on here and I can&#8217;t figure it out. I can&#8217;t believe they would just allow this to fester out of pure infantilism. It makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Marcoe</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59400</link>
		<dc:creator>David Marcoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59400</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t think I agree with this assessment. Under/assistant secretaries are usually political appointments as well, and I believe most Bush appointments have packed up and left...&quot;

Indeed, but most presidencies retain people from the prior administrations, appointments are made throughout a term and secretaries are as thick as bamboo in Washington. The Obama administration, still only less than a year old, has also been painfully slow in getting appointments through, such that a third of the open posts were still vacant mid-year. They aren&#039;t going to replace eight years of Bush appointments with a snap of their fingers.

In any case, you&#039;re missing the main point, which is that, by all appearances, the top of the hierarchy needs drool cups, while it&#039;s people lower on the totem pole who are doing the day-to-day management and making sure things don&#039;t careen out of control. How far you have to go down before the political stupidity is no longer at noxious levels is certainly up for speculation and debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t think I agree with this assessment. Under/assistant secretaries are usually political appointments as well, and I believe most Bush appointments have packed up and left&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, but most presidencies retain people from the prior administrations, appointments are made throughout a term and secretaries are as thick as bamboo in Washington. The Obama administration, still only less than a year old, has also been painfully slow in getting appointments through, such that a third of the open posts were still vacant mid-year. They aren&#8217;t going to replace eight years of Bush appointments with a snap of their fingers.</p>
<p>In any case, you&#8217;re missing the main point, which is that, by all appearances, the top of the hierarchy needs drool cups, while it&#8217;s people lower on the totem pole who are doing the day-to-day management and making sure things don&#8217;t careen out of control. How far you have to go down before the political stupidity is no longer at noxious levels is certainly up for speculation and debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen L</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59399</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59399</guid>
		<description>Marcoe -&quot;It’s the assistant and under secretaries–the people left over from the Bush administration–who are doing the heavy lifting.&quot; I don&#039;t think I agree with this assessment. Under/assistant secretaries are usually political appointments as well, and I believe most Bush appointments have packed up and left. Are you referring to specific people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcoe -&#8221;It’s the assistant and under secretaries–the people left over from the Bush administration–who are doing the heavy lifting.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think I agree with this assessment. Under/assistant secretaries are usually political appointments as well, and I believe most Bush appointments have packed up and left. Are you referring to specific people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59397</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59397</guid>
		<description>You might be right Rufus but if it gets too hard and it is just her they may toss her under the bus to. I think she was asked to allow these two clowns in by someone higher up the food chain. I just get a bad feeling about that. The Secret Service Agents are road kill. To allow her to do this is dangerous and they ought to know that but they seem so flip about it. Thats whats wierd. So flip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be right Rufus but if it gets too hard and it is just her they may toss her under the bus to. I think she was asked to allow these two clowns in by someone higher up the food chain. I just get a bad feeling about that. The Secret Service Agents are road kill. To allow her to do this is dangerous and they ought to know that but they seem so flip about it. Thats whats wierd. So flip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17008/comment-page-1#comment-59393</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17008#comment-59393</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not even sure my stance makes sense, but I think all of you are right.  I think Stephanie&#039;s scenario is highly likely, but I also think they are stonewalling simply to stonewall.  When no one calls your bet in poker you never, ever show your cards, even if you weren&#039;t bluffing and had the winning hand.  The Obama administration will not give up any information they do not have to, or that they do not control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even sure my stance makes sense, but I think all of you are right.  I think Stephanie&#8217;s scenario is highly likely, but I also think they are stonewalling simply to stonewall.  When no one calls your bet in poker you never, ever show your cards, even if you weren&#8217;t bluffing and had the winning hand.  The Obama administration will not give up any information they do not have to, or that they do not control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

