Coming Soon!

fantastic_voyage-300x225

According to this SITE, who quotes the MTV Movie Blog, James Cameron plans to make a 3D re-make of the 60’s Sci-Fi film, Fantastic Voyage. I read the book written by Isaac Asimov in Junior High School and mistakenly thought the film and cartoon of the time were based on this until I looked at the wiki entry (assuming of course that is correct).

The folks at Gamma Squad rightly point out that the 60’s version of Fantastic Voyage is most remembered for the scene where Raquel Welch appears in a white wet-suit. To this I ask, who wouldn’t remember a movie that Raquel Welsh appeared in a white wet-suit?

wet-raquel

I don’t know, I think I’d rather see this re-make…
PD small

She’s not in Kansas anymore!

18 comments to Coming Soon!

  • Raoul Ortega

    Oz can’t be that great a place. Given a choice between Oz and Kansas, she chooses Kansas?

  • They actually make a point of that in the first book (There’s aout 40 Oz novels) – her traveling companions ask her flat out “If the place you’re from is so terrible, why would you want to go back there?” and she honestly doesn’t know, apart from it’s home and it’s all she’s ever known. I think the point of that was that there’s a lot of people who’ll throw away good stuff they can have in favor of crappy stuff they already know. I’m probably guilty of that myself.

    Dorothy’s completely absent from the second book (Which is my favorite in the entire series, excepting the creepy ending). Books 3-6 all start out with Dorothy either in Kansas, or somewhere else in the outside world, and making her way to Oz by some method or another – sometimes accidental, sometimes malicious, sometimes on purpose – and in the end of the sixth book, her and her aunt and uncle and their dog loose the farm once and for all, and go to live in Oz permanently.

    The sixth book was intended to be the end of the series, but obviously that didn’t take, and Baum was back cranking out more books in a couple years when his funds ran low.

    Interesting guy. He kept trying to start new series to prove he wasn’t a one-trick pony, then the series would fail and he’d end up having to tie them in to Oz to make anyone buy any of ‘em, so the “Oz-iverse” kept growing by leaps and bounds. Actually, I think I’ll go look up how many books there are, now I’m wondering…

  • David Marcoe

    This reminds me of something that Chesterton said about patriotism in Orthodoxy:

    Whatever the reason, it seemed and still seems to me that our attitude towards life can be better expressed in terms of a kind of military loyalty than in terms of criticism and approval. My acceptance of the universe is not optimism, it is more like patriotism. It is a matter of primary loyalty. The world is not a lodging-house at Brighton, which we are to leave because it is miserable. It is the fortress of our family, with the flag flying on the turret, and the more miserable it is the less we should leave it. The point is not that this world is too sad to love or too glad not to love; the point is that when you do love a thing, its gladness is a reason for loving it, and its sadness a reason for loving it more. All optimistic thoughts about England and all pessimistic thoughts about her are alike reasons for the English patriot. Similarly, optimism and pessimism are alike arguments for the cosmic patriot.

    Let us suppose we are confronted with a desperate thing–say Pimlico. If we think what is really best for Pimlico we shall find the thread of thought leads to the throne or the mystic and the arbitrary. It is not enough for a man to disapprove of Pimlico: in that case he will merely cut his throat or move to Chelsea. Nor, certainly, is it enough for a man to approve of Pimlico: for then it will remain Pimlico, which would be awful. The only way out of it seems to be for somebody to love Pimlico: to love it with a transcendental tie and without any earthly reason. If there arose a man who loved Pimlico, then Pimlico would rise into ivory towers and golden pinnacles; Pimlico would attire herself as a woman does when she is loved. For decoration is not given to hide horrible things: but to decorate things already adorable. A mother does not give her child a blue bow because he is so ugly without it. A lover does not give a girl a necklace to hide her neck. If men loved Pimlico as mothers love children, arbitrarily, because it is THEIRS, Pimlico in a year or two might be fairer than Florence. Some readers will say that this is a mere fantasy. I answer that this is the actual history of mankind. This, as a fact, is how cities did grow great. Go back to the darkest roots of civilization and you will find them knotted round some sacred stone or encircling some sacred well. People first paid honour to a spot and afterwards gained glory for it. Men did not love Rome because she was great. She was great because they had loved her.

  • Ok, there’s 40 “Official” Oz books set in Oz, 14 by Baum, 19 by Ruth Thompson, his secretary, and six by two different authors. Then there’s two “Trot & Cap’n Bill” novels set outside of Oz, and one set in it, which counts as part of the 40, but, of course, the other two don’t. Then there’s at least two novels set in magical lands outside of Oz that are connected to it by internal references. Then there’s The Secret Life of Stanta Claus, which is also part of it. So, really, not as many as I thought. Four definitely-connected non-Oz novels.

    In addition to those 44, there’s a whole freakin’ slew of unoffical Oz books.

  • Kit

    I do not know why, but I could stare at that Raquel Welch photo all day.

  • Scott M.

    Ought to see the one from “One Million B.C.”,Kit…hubba hubba

  • So, I’m guessing, the remake of “Fantastic Voyage” is going to extol the virtues of socialized medicine – given Cameron’s track record.

  • Raquel Welch – the prototypical “Long on legs, short on sylables” actress. I remember in the early 90s when she went to Chicago to give a pro-democratic pro-abortion speech during an election year, and she said “I’ve come to Chicago because Chicago is one of the fifty two united states…” She also seemed to think that the Great Lakes were part of the ocean.

    But it’s not like they were paying her to talk back in the day, probably for good reason.

    So anyone here (Other than me) seen Fantastic Voyage? Running my site, I find a lot of people didn’t spend their entire childhood glued to old crappy movies like I did…

    • Loved Fantastic Voyage as a kid. In addition to the requisite rainy-day viewings, they even showed it at my elementary school, too. Days before video meant anyone could watch the movie anytime, Kit. ;-)

      Love Innerspace even more.

    • justjack

      Fantastic Voyage is still on my personal favorite top-10 sci-fi movies. Last summer I watched it with my son who was then-14. He ate it up.

      This movie, and Sean Connery James Bond movies, seemed to always get shown on ABC. I can still hear that ABC movie of the week music in my head, just thinking about it.

      At the time, Fantastic Voyage was to me the ultimate cool of what the future would bring: lots of Racquel Welches in white wet suits.

      Actually, Outlaw, the thing we all recall wasn’t just Racquel in the wet suit. It was her in the wet suit, being squeezed by the antibodies, and then when the guys got her back into the sub they started grabbing at her body to pull off the antibodies.

      The story goes that in the first take, all the guys grabbed at her everywhere EXCEPT for the chestal area — too shy. Cut! shouts the director, who tells them listen guys, you gotta rescue her, she’s strangulatin’! So on take 2, the guys naturally all dive at her chestal area. Cut! shouts the director again, who realizes that they’re going to have to choreograph this scene a little bit.

      Oh yeah, I had the One Million BC poster, too. Right next to Farrah’s.

      Got to give Racquel her props, though, for the job she did in The Three Musketeers. She was funny and lovable in that. And hot.

      BTW, don’t bother with Asimov’s reboot novel, “Fantastic Voyage II.” He was always bugged about the bad science in the original story that he wrote the novelization for, and so he eventually went back and rewrote the story, this time with good science. But in the reboot, he forgot to put in the awesome. Snorrrrr.

  • I was more into vampire and werewolf flicks when I was a kid. Most likely good training for the politics of today!

  • We were debating whether or not I should review this for my “Saturday Afternoon B-Movie Crap Fest” feature, but ultimately decided I probably shouldn’t, since it’s basically an A-picture, even if it is overwhelmingly silly.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>