<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would Toto Watch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464</link>
	<description>These are our principles.  If you don&#039;t like them, we have others...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wankette</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60896</link>
		<dc:creator>Wankette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60896</guid>
		<description>Christian! it&#039;s good to have you!

(um, &lt;em&gt;here&lt;/em&gt;.  It&#039;s good to have you &lt;em&gt;here&lt;/em&gt;, she stammered)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian! it&#8217;s good to have you!</p>
<p>(um, <em>here</em>.  It&#8217;s good to have you <em>here</em>, she stammered)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60852</guid>
		<description>Christian,

Although she&#039;s 99.999% perfect, one of Mrs. Firefly&#039;s few flaws is an appreciation of George Clooney.  She insists her attraction is based solely on his acting ability...  Anywho, I get dragged to most of his films and, of course, now she wants to see this &quot;Up in the Air&quot; deal.  Is it:

A) tolerable enough to keep me in a theater seat for 90 minutes as long as I&#039;ve got a 10 gallon bucket of popcorn drenched in salt and oil on my lap?
b) mediocre but there are no loud noises so I can catch up on some much needed sleep, opening my eyes just before the credits roll in order to please the Mrs., or
c) chick flick.  I should put my foot down and insist she see it with a female friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian,</p>
<p>Although she&#8217;s 99.999% perfect, one of Mrs. Firefly&#8217;s few flaws is an appreciation of George Clooney.  She insists her attraction is based solely on his acting ability&#8230;  Anywho, I get dragged to most of his films and, of course, now she wants to see this &#8220;Up in the Air&#8221; deal.  Is it:</p>
<p>A) tolerable enough to keep me in a theater seat for 90 minutes as long as I&#8217;ve got a 10 gallon bucket of popcorn drenched in salt and oil on my lap?<br />
b) mediocre but there are no loud noises so I can catch up on some much needed sleep, opening my eyes just before the credits roll in order to please the Mrs., or<br />
c) chick flick.  I should put my foot down and insist she see it with a female friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Toto</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60815</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Toto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60815</guid>
		<description>Outlaw -- Completely agree with your critique. They did a poor job of massaging the story to get Kirk in the captain&#039;s chair. For me, so much of the film worked as intended that I was able to overlook that.

Seems like an easy problem to fix in the script, but they really wanted to make Kirk the bad boy turned good. 

And Spock rose up the ranks rather fast, too!

But Karl Urban really won me over as McCoy, a character I feared would be a caricature at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlaw &#8212; Completely agree with your critique. They did a poor job of massaging the story to get Kirk in the captain&#8217;s chair. For me, so much of the film worked as intended that I was able to overlook that.</p>
<p>Seems like an easy problem to fix in the script, but they really wanted to make Kirk the bad boy turned good. </p>
<p>And Spock rose up the ranks rather fast, too!</p>
<p>But Karl Urban really won me over as McCoy, a character I feared would be a caricature at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The College Widow</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60803</link>
		<dc:creator>The College Widow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60803</guid>
		<description>Will do, Mike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will do, Mike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenn Christenson</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60799</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenn Christenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60799</guid>
		<description>The whole Spok Uhura thing ruined it for me. Talk about a zero chemistry relationship - has to be the poster child for that one.

I can see your point about CoC - Star Trek is famous for having all the high ranking officers, on ship, exploring the new planet.  Kind of like having the Captain of an aircraft carrier taking off in an F-18 - ain&#039;t gonna happen in the real world.  But, that&#039;s Star Trek, for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole Spok Uhura thing ruined it for me. Talk about a zero chemistry relationship &#8211; has to be the poster child for that one.</p>
<p>I can see your point about CoC &#8211; Star Trek is famous for having all the high ranking officers, on ship, exploring the new planet.  Kind of like having the Captain of an aircraft carrier taking off in an F-18 &#8211; ain&#8217;t gonna happen in the real world.  But, that&#8217;s Star Trek, for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60792</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60792</guid>
		<description>Toto,

That idea is so brilliant it will never be implemented!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toto,</p>
<p>That idea is so brilliant it will never be implemented!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlaw13</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60779</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlaw13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60779</guid>
		<description>Christian, Star Trek a &quot;cinematic treat&quot; really?  There were entirely too many leaps of logic for me to enjoy that movie.  

Chief amongst them, and the one I can&#039;t get around, I suppose that a star ship the size of an aircraft carrier has no chain of command.  Just because a couple of officers are out of the picture, a stow-away who was one second away from the brig, who was previously thrown off the ship now becomes the guy in charge.  THAT RUINED THE MOVIE...for me anyway.  NO I&#039;m not a big Star Trek fan, and I admit I&#039;m kind of fixated on that part of the &quot;plot&quot;, and I&#039;ve been in the Army for twenty plus years so that probably has a lot to do with it...but I can&#039;t get around that.

For those of you who enjoyed the film I am happy for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian, Star Trek a &#8220;cinematic treat&#8221; really?  There were entirely too many leaps of logic for me to enjoy that movie.  </p>
<p>Chief amongst them, and the one I can&#8217;t get around, I suppose that a star ship the size of an aircraft carrier has no chain of command.  Just because a couple of officers are out of the picture, a stow-away who was one second away from the brig, who was previously thrown off the ship now becomes the guy in charge.  THAT RUINED THE MOVIE&#8230;for me anyway.  NO I&#8217;m not a big Star Trek fan, and I admit I&#8217;m kind of fixated on that part of the &#8220;plot&#8221;, and I&#8217;ve been in the Army for twenty plus years so that probably has a lot to do with it&#8230;but I can&#8217;t get around that.</p>
<p>For those of you who enjoyed the film I am happy for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60774</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60774</guid>
		<description>Christian,does it get harder every year finding really worthy films?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian,does it get harder every year finding really worthy films?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60759</guid>
		<description>Nope, CW.  Keep visiting Christian&#039;s site, &#039;cause we&#039;ll only be getting a taste over here, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, CW.  Keep visiting Christian&#8217;s site, &#8217;cause we&#8217;ll only be getting a taste over here, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.threedonia.com/archives/17464/comment-page-1#comment-60751</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threedonia.com/?p=17464#comment-60751</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t go &quot;full retard,&quot; right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t go &#8220;full retard,&#8221; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

