Well, an attempt at humorous banter, and a highly unsuccessful one, obviously.

No harm meant.

I said it showed evidence of a certain pattern. Namely, that prolonged exposure to porn had a certain result.

…that exposure to PoRN tended to reduce the sexual appetite?

I said it deadened the arousal response, not necessarily the addiction. With addictive behaviors, a greater stimulus is required over time, whether it’s narcotics, drinking, gambling, porn, sex addiction, or what have you. That’s also psychology 101.

I’d say you just refuted that theory.

I say you cherry-picked my statement, which if you bothered to finish the quote, “…not that bad, but it will be awkward explaining it.” It’s maybe a “PG-13.” Hardly pornography, but it might not be suitable for a work environment, hence NSFW/Not Safe For Work. And as I said immediately after that, “Believe it or not, I actually enjoy the song and cinematography, quite aside from choreography.” Try actually reading I wrote and reading in context.

If this is just humorous banter, then forgive my tone, but I’m getting the distinct impression you’re sniping for me, combined with your comment on the zombie post, after what I thought was my obvious attempt at humor.

Wasn’t somebody just saying that science has proved that exposure to PoRN tended to reduce the sexual appetite?

I’d say you just refuted that theory.