I want to hear no more about men not being able to concentrate because they ogle women nonstop — NO MORE.
When it comes to checking out competition women should not worry about men checking them out – but women instead. That is according to research carried out which suggests women ogle the bodies of other women for far longer than their male partners do. University researchers discovered that while men stare at the faces of people in photographs and fine art paintings, women are more interested in looking at their breasts.
In heterosexual couples shown a photo or a painting of a man and a woman, both preferred to look at the female form, but women ‘checked out’ the figure, whereas men tended to stare at the face. Boffins at the University of Bristol examined eye movement and found women looked in fewer places when presented with an image, but focused mainly on the female form.
Men, on the other hand, made many more eye movements, scanning the entire image, but paused only to stare at faces rather than breasts. The new findings prove that women in a relationship are much more interested in checking out other women than their men are.
Felix Mercer Moss, PhD student in the Department of Computer Science who led the study, said: ‘The study represents the most compelling evidence yet that, despite occupying the same world, the viewpoints of men and women can, at times, be very different.
(Ed. Bolding mine and I put the sentences into paragraphs unlike the Telegraph editor)
Irony. It’s ironic! And science tells me so.
But, but, but, Floyd…it’s all about the reasons for the looking! Women may be jealous, but men may want. Know what I mean, Vern?
MORE COWBELL!
It doesn’t surprise me, I’ve known for a long time that women mostly dress for other women, in order to make them jealous, or inspire envy of some sort. I do think it’s interesting though. I wonder why we do that?
Checking out the competition, maybe?
Empirical evidence — Exhibit 40D.
Can’t argue against that.
No siree, Bob!
Love those Loren/Mansfield pics.
Yeah. Tryin’ to see if she had that “come hither” look.
And you’re tryin’ to convince me thaty the mens were tryin’ to look into her soul?
Junk science. Thinkin’ with yer junk again, eh fellers? What else is new? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
*o^
Sorry, TCR — you can’t fight biology.
-fritz-’s 6:05 p.m. link below is a bloody brawl against biology, IMO.
…which she can never win.
Nobody here is going to believe me, but I always look at the face first.
you’re right… we don’t believe you.
Here ya go, Outlaw!
talk about labia majora… ay caramba!
That’s why you check out the face…poor Kurt.
I’m a J. Geils Band kinda guy.
Maybe that’s why those poor women on The View are so confused. They’re too busy oogling each other to think.
This isn’t news. My husband was just saying that a few days ago. That People Mag cover of Paula Broadwell got more remarks (all catty) from the ladies in line than any from the men. Women don’t get dressed up for men as much as we do to take down the competition. Anyone telling me that women aren’t competitive has no clue. Sisterhood? Its BS.
Getting a PhD in boobs…that’s what I call higher education.
it’s uplifting Scott.
The twin peaks of Knowledge and Wisdom require a firm foundation.
Here’s a pallette cleanser for you!
http://tinyurl.com/bquu7z3
No one in this thread is going to click on anything with tiny in the title.
Oh, Tracy! I did and it was awful!! Don’t do it!!
Trying for amateur Marcoe status, are we? 8-0
Just trying to make sure we’re all on the same page here!
The overwhelming data are clear …
(Roll your eyes but roll to the end).
Schooled. Spanked. Mother knows.
Feh! Bieber and Kutcher are squinting and they know it.
Sorry, TCR — the facts are already in and it appears you’re all wet.
NSFW!!
That (those?) and an F-bomb, and still rated PG. Ahhhh, for the days in 1984 before PG-13 was instituted!