According to the logic of this guy and his new nominee:
One of these people is better qualified based on certain characteristics…. Let’s go down the list: One is female, Latina, has a lot of life experience, well-traveled, is very empathetic, very charismatic, and has experience working with a lot of powerful people including world leaders, and entertainment and corporate leaders She is also a musician. The other is a Caucasian male with decades of experience managing a diverse team, dealing with a diverse set of people regularly and on a rotating basis, served in the US Navy earlier in his career and worked his way up the ladder of success. He is also a single father and has a reputation as a stern, but fair leader and decision-maker. We all know which one the above guy will choose. Say hello to your new Supreme Court Justice nominee — pictured with the man over whom her qualifications soar.


Print
Digg
StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
Facebook
Yahoo! Buzz
Twitter
Google Bookmarks
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
MSN Reporter
MySpace
Orkut
Ping.fm
Reddit
RSS
Slashdot
Technorati
Tumblr
Webnews.de
Coochie Coochie
“Coochie, coochie!”
Great minds, Scott! At least I used quotes.
I always remember a story where she was coochie cooing in a White House performance with Gerald Ford and her boob (lo siento — “casaba”) popped out of her dress.
Hate to say this. Oh how I hate to say this, but once again, Floyd’s right. Oh yes, and “coochie, coochie!”
Did anyone else listen to President Obama’s speech this morning? Am I the only one who heard him say, “20 centuries?” He was talking about the law that his nominee would look to. Did he screw up and mean to say, “2 centuries?” Or, is he bypassing the Constitution and referencing Judeo-Christian law? That would seem odd coming from President B.O. (“America is not a Christian nation”), and the Ten Commandments are much more than 20 centuries old.
I think 2,000 years ago refers to Imperial Rome. I think it was intentional.
Did you hear him say “20 centuries?” Or am I nuts (those are not, necessarily, mutually exclusive…).
Rufus is always so superior..and nuts
Merv Griffin used to have Charo on a lot
She had two bits: “Coochie, coochie!” and “three, four, five, sex!”
Merv Griffin was a pro. Imagine having to set those lines up all the time.
Griffin’s all time best guest: Rip Taylor.
On a lot where?
on the Pyrenees
God help us but Captain Stubeing would be a better Justice.
And we may have some great looking chickas on the poop deck.
Time for another great pic of Salma, Floyd.
Second the thought,Fritz…Floyd will probably show Nancy Pelosi naked,though
Scott, why did you go there. Now the home made chili I made to celebrate the new justice’s (dis)appointment is just gonna get ralphed when I think of that picture. And please for Mike, make it a small pic. They’re harder to hit.
If the primary qualification for a Supreme Court justice is that one be a latina, how about her?
That’ll work! I notice it’s a “big” pic. Thanks.
My first visit here, found the blog accidentally really, and I just wanted to say I’ve enjoyed my visit and had some good reads while here
Juan
Well keep coming back, Juan. The more the merrier!